Editorial Standards

Originality and reader value

Articles use original wording, structure, and analysis. A source summary should add useful context, explain the limits of the evidence, and make clear which statements come from the source.

Sources and factual review

We prefer primary sources for material claims, link to the records used, and attribute claims to the organizations or people who made them. Editors should check dates, quantities, scope, assumptions, and relevant caveats before publication.

Human editorial review is part of the publication process. It evaluates factual accuracy and presentation; it does not mean that MiniArticlo independently reproduced every result described in an article.

Corrections

When we identify a material factual error, we review it against the source evidence and correct the article when needed. We explain significant changes in the article when appropriate. A source’s announcement date is not presented as MiniArticlo’s publication or update date.

See the Corrections Policy for the current process and contact-channel status.

AI assistance and illustrations

AI tools may assist with research organization, drafting, or editing. AI output is not a source or independent verification; editors remain responsible for claims and publication decisions.

Some conceptual illustrations are created with generative AI. They are illustrations, not documentary photographs or evidence. We retain available provenance information. An AI-origin disclosure does not establish that every prompt, reference input, or reuse right has been cleared.

Editorial bylines

Public bylines are category-based MiniArticlo editorial pen names. They do not imply a verified individual biography, employment history, professional credential, or eyewitness account.